Almaviva, closes the see of Rome: games 1666 letters of dismissal – the Journal

The Rome headquarters of the call center Almaviva Contact closes, and the letters of dismissal of the 1666 employees are already all matches.

According to sources in the ministry of economic Development, the last attempt with the re-opening of the table is failed. The meeting held in the last Thursday to the ministry of economic Development between the company call center, and the trade unions, in fact, has not produced any results. After a restricted meeting between minister Carlo Calenda, the vice-Teresa Bellanova, the company and the union representatives of the category – targeted to understand if there was still the possibility of extending the agreement last week, also to the see of Rome, the company has the opposite reasoning jurisdictional stringent and inevitable.

The mobility procedure is in fact completed just last December 22, 1666 letters of dismissal have already been sent out, and a forcing could trigger a complex legal dispute. The Rome headquarters of Almaviva Contact, already inactive for a week, is thus bound to the closure. “Profonda bitterness. Despite a last attempt on Rome, does not revoke the layoffs. The workers had to be heard before the”, writes on Twitter, the deputy minister of Economic Development, Teresa Bellanova.

While Marco Miccoli, deputatao romand Pd he writes in a note: “The definitive closure of the dispute, Almaviva Contact, which took place today at the Put, with 1 666 layoffs, it is a defeat of all. It is not enough to put in the

field resources for social safety nets, most stringent standards for relocation and the social clause to change the contract. The company has not wanted to reopen the negotiation, in spite of the referendum that was held a few days ago among the workers and that he had seen to prevail, the yes to the agreement. I think it is ungenerous and unfair to now blame all the blame to the rsu, which had decided not to sign the agreement. Not to mention the total lack of social responsibility on the part of the company. The things put in the field by the Government and the Parliament, were, in fact, been requested by the entrepreneurs of the sector, and Almaviva. Perhaps the win was just the arrogance of those who did not want to take no te of these efforts, which were related to avert layoffs. For this reason, the responsibility of Almaviva, in our opinion, are obvious and serious. Rome pays a high price, I pay especially innocent workers and their families, they deserve our solidarity and our concern. Today, their anger is also ours.”