– The heavy cuts suffered by the municipalities (8 billion between 2010 and 2014) were offset, in the last three years, by a “gradual increase in tax burden “local, increased from EUR 505.5 in 2011 to 618.4 € in 2014. The head of the Audit Office writes in the report on local finances, saying that” the maximum level of tax collection “are in municipalities with more than 250 thousand inhabitants, where you get to 881.94 € per person.
Leonardo Rafanelli
The “very pronounced increase” local taxes were indispensable, say to the Court of Auditors, for ” maintain the balance in response to severe corrective measures of the government “, and after these measures today the weight of taxation” is the limits of the compatibility with the local fiscal capacity. ”
“On the revenue side – reads the foreword to the report – the root of a biasing mechanism, for which the competition of local authorities to fiscal targets weighs, ultimately, the taxpayer in terms of tax increases, originates in the heavy and repeated cuts to state resources arranged by financial maneuvers that continued in 2011, it echoed the chronic delay in the re-composition of the sources of financing of the expenditure necessary to ensure efficient public services and economic. This compounds and It makes permanent the inefficiency of management, despite the significant increase of the own revenues (+ 15.63% compared to 2013) which increases the financial autonomy beyond the threshold of 65% and absorbs the progressive reduction and constant transfers (- 27,29%). “
The magistrates accounting also observed that” the growth of financial institutions, however, do not seem to produce beneficial effects on neither services nor on consumption and on local employment, in the absence of an adequate share of Stimulated by public investment “and” he would then be recovered federalist project that links the responsibility to ‘grip’ the responsibility of ‘spending’, realizing a necessary correlation between sampling and use. ”
Project “which is certainly functional costing and standard requirements, necessary to finally overcome the criterion of ‘historical expenditure’, but that the more recent regulatory action does not seem to adequately support, going in the direction greater flexibility of the financial statements, an ephemeral liquidity recovery with very long-term redemption charges and a reduction of the expenses connected with the fledgling discipline of accounting. “
In order to send Reply vote a comment, you must be registered and log
Registration Login X
Rules for comments
The comments on this page are checked
We encourage you to use respectful language and not offensive, even for the harshest criticism
In particular, during the monitoring activity, we reserve the right to remove comments that:
– are not relevant to the issues in website and TV show
– have content vulgar, obscene or violent
– Let intimidating or defamatory towards people, other people, institutions and religions
– More generally violates the rights of third parties
– Promote illegal activities
– Promote commercial products or services
X
No comments:
Post a Comment