pensioners today do not come to a thousand euro monthly allowance will have a fourteenth of between 330 and 500 euro, while those who take less than 750 euro will have a monthly increase of between 100 and 150 euros. Are some of the key measures in the area of pensions entered from the government in the budget Law. The measure will also set the cost of early exit (Epas), which will be between 4.5% and 5% for each year of advance. The details of the measure have been anticipated, a few hours after the meeting between the government and trade unions, from the undersecretary to the presidency of the Council, Tommaso Nannicini, in the course of an interview with the Tg2. Nannicini explained welfare measures with the “requirements of fairness”. “The time had come – he said – to give a sign to the low income pension”, “a signal to those in distress, those who are unemployed or doing heavy work”. The Bee social, announced, “the income bridge will be entirely borne by the state”. it is Not still well identified the audience of who can have access to this Bee facilitated, that is, to the income bridge to retirement without cost to the worker is over 63 years old in need of. And likely to give immediate access to the benefit of the unemployed, the disabled and relatives of disabled people (it is possible to use the criterion of who already has the law, 104), postponing to the next year, the definition of work hard for which the trade unions have instead asked for measures now. The other knot to untie is the amount of the income bridge to retirement (at the level of Reels, the unemployment benefit with a limit of 1,300 euros, or less). The Accounting press for a subsistence income that would render less convenient the access, while the unions are asking for that is as near as possible to the pension which has accrued. You are making the accounts on the Epa’s voluntary. If, in fact, until a few days ago, there was talk of a intervention neutral to State coffers (with a load greater than the 6% per year for the worker who decides to quit the job in advance), in recent days, the premier Renzi has talked about a return for the loan of around 5% per annum. Percentage confirmed in the evening by Nannicini which pointed out the need of fiscal aid of the State to keep low the percentage of the penalty. This means, given that the loan should be returned in 20 years, that the cargo interests and the insurance premium for the cases of premorienza will be the responsibility of the State, probably spread forward over the years. It is expected that the remaining instalments in the event of death does not weigh on the heirs. And this is also confirmed by Nannicini: “The heirs are not risking anything”. The bet is probably linked to the poor palatability of the tool that should ensure that the number of users is low and therefore not too burdensome, the costs for the State. It is likely, instead, that you define reductions for the companies that in the view of renovations they decide to pay the contributions for the older workers in the output. Basically defined, is the increase for the lowest pensions through the mechanism of the fourteenth, an additional sum to give once a year linked to the contributions paid. It provides for the extension of the audience (2.1 million people over 64 who have personal incomes totaling less than one and a half times the minimum, around 750 euros per month) of about 1.2 million by extending the limit of income of two times the minimum (about 1,000 euro per month). The amounts (from 336 to 504 euros per year depending on the contributions paid) will be increased to 30% for those who perceive it already (the sum of 504 euro will fall to € 666). The measure, however, does not take into account nor the income of the family (theoretically may take the fourteenth, the wife of a wealthy man who has paid a few years of contributions) nor the years of pension received (for example, a baby retired, output to 40 years, and the rest 25 after less than 20 years of contributions). The discussion is still open on the ricongiunzioni contributory periods (the costs seem to be higher than those initially assumed) and on the possible ransom of the degree both for the purposes of old-age pension or the early. You should also be towards the equalization of the no-tax area between the workers and the pensioners and to the “bonus” social security for workers in the early engaged in strenuous activities, or who are unemployed with access to a pension once you have reached 41 years of contributions. For the heavy and arduous professions will broaden the mesh by removing the constraint of the employment in this activity in the last year of work.
- Topics:
- pensions
- ape
- early retirement
- the law of balance
- Starring:
No comments:
Post a Comment