Contrasting the ratings top banker on the system of guarantees agreed between Italy and the EU for managing npl Italian banks. Some substantially positive opinions they accompany other marked by a certain skepticism. For example, according to Gianluca Garbi, CEO of Bank System 
, “insurance” from the state “do not know what it will cost; it is a very small thing in size, so it is not a solution.” Banks “will continue as a download” non performing loans “when they find opportunities to sell to investors and hedge funds. But I do not think that the mechanism gives a big boost to the disposal of npl”.
On the other hand His Cristiano Carrus, to Veneto Banca, first pointed out “that is not a bad bank, but a combination of vehicles that go up and down. However I think I have recourse if I scasserà the income statement. “But Carrus adds that” it is still too early to assess the cost. Then there is the threshold limit of three years that can be dangerous, because if I can within that time to close the transaction, in addition to supporting the higher cost then I can not even wrap their unsecured. Before leaving I will have to present very good operation. “
He prefers not rule Victor Massiah, CEO of Ubi Banca :” We are still studying the ruling “.
Positive instead the comment Federico Ghizzoni, head of Unicredit , which states that “the safeguards put in place by the government in recent days, if well defined, in some way help”. But Ghizzoni has pointed out that the “sufferings Italian are fully funded side. The real problem is the speed of recovery of collateral. ” For the CEO of Unicredit actually the bad bank agreed with the EU alone is not enough. “If the government will take other initiatives, the problem will be resolved quickly.” The most direct reference is the reform of bankruptcy law. “Banks can not sell 200 billion euro of suffering in a few months; demand it would be crazy, “said Ghizzoni.
No comments:
Post a Comment