It seems to complicate the process of approving the Plan the Port of Pescara. Being, in fact, the group of M5S to the City of Pescara, the Board of Public Works has substantially “cut off” the Plan port noting “deficiencies of various fundamental aspects”. According to the coordinator of the M5S, Massimo Di Renzo, and councilors Erika Alessandrini and Massimiliano Di Pillo,
The deficiencies are so heavy that the Superior Council is not ‘state able to issue the requested opinion, but you and ‘had to limit to apply for a long series of additional documents. Given the importance of the documentation required, it is difficult to understand the optimism that transpires from the statements of the deputy mayor Enzo Del Vecchio and the governor Luciano D’Alfonso giving the port master plan as approved almost. Ads that, in light of these new documents, you must ‘wait perhaps tens of years because’ can be realized.
Specifically, the criticality ‘are related to the lack of the Plan excerpt Defense floods “indispensable – highlight the pentastellati – to assess the flood risk, given the dangerous trend all’esondazione river Pescara, not properly considered by the analysis of the PRP, so ‘as the courses to be taken into consideration must be significantly more’ high of those analyzed “; plant fire; and the economic and financial evaluation of the work, “whereas the analysis and ‘now dated to 2008 and that, despite announcements, missing altogether integrated assessments of the port system between Pescara Abruzzo, Vasto and Ortona.”
The Ministry – says Alessandrini – writes in black and white that this colossal project by more ‘than 200 million euro, includes the creation of new traffic but without’ having analyzed the actual needs both for traffic is about the reality ‘production: in a few words tell us to redo all accounts well and considerations expansion’ cause we are in danger of throwing away unnecessarily large part of these public money.
The M5S you say “well aware of the urgency of a new port plan”, but claims to be equally certain “that there are alternative solutions.”
THE REPLY – morning came the reply of Mayor Marco Alessandrini and his deputy Enzo Del Vecchio, who is also city councilor for public works: the two say they do not understand if the tone of the note of grillini is “jubilant because they feel that the PRP will not be never approved, or whether, the signatories of the note have perhaps not understood the substance of the requests made by the Board of Public Works. “
On December 10, 2014 – explain Alessandrini and Del Vecchio – the Superior Council examining the PRP has highlighted a number of elements to integration to proceed to the release of the final opinion. This activity, which is typical in the examination of all the zoning port. Even before the Council expresses in this regard, there have been countless meetings at its headquarters, during which and with direct confrontation with members of the Commission, had already highlighted the support measures to be implemented. So the work of the Region, City, Harbour and designers to respond to the findings formalized only on 14 December, in the course of work for a long time and is almost defined. The salient-emphasized in the Superior Council essentially concern four elements: morphological studies of the marine area; the hydraulic relationship that takes into account a return time of river flows between 100 and 200 years old and not 50 y ears as provided by the plan; third aspect, the fire safety related to commercial activities that take place in the port of Pescara and, finally, the economic-financial, the latter element of absolute naturalness, in light of the fact that the PRP is dated April 2009 and six years away any project goes revisited in these respects. At the last meeting on 18 February at the Abruzzo region was made the point of all the activities in progress and is scheduled for completion of all the technical and administrative during the month of March.
Alessandrini and Del Vecchio are optimistic about a “speedy adoption of the expected instrument,” recalling that Region, City, Harbour, Basin Authority and the professionals who prepared PRP “have committed since the middle of December to provide as asked, then since the Council of Public Works has requested additions and updates of data and further analysis with respect to the plan excerpt of the floods, who are preparing with the different actors. “
It’s not a slam on therefore, as instead refer pentastellati, but, more realistically, a simple integration – conclude mayor and deputy mayor – Aware of everything and the absolute necessity to come final approval of the Port Master Plan, we will use time reminders to respond to the findings of the Board of Public Works.
No comments:
Post a Comment