– “The burden of bargaining at the national level, for the period 2010-2015, relative to all public employees, could not be less than 35 billion “, with” structural effect of around 13 billion “annually since 2016. This was stated by the State Attorney in memory to Consult on the constitutionality block of bargaining in the public sector.
Guido Caianiello
The short Advocacy invites the Consultation to consider and assess the constitutionality of the block of contracts, the economic impact of this measure and writes: “These effects can not be disregarded as a result of constitutional reform” that “has rewritten the article 81 of the Constitution, from the disposal of the new paragraph 1, according to which ‘The State ensures’ balance between revenue and expenditure of the budget, taking into account the phases of the adverse and favorable phases of the economic cycle ‘. ” The numbers say that, if the block was removed, including revaluation of salaries and payments of arrears, the public purse would be subject to a splurge.
At the hearing of 23 June – The text was drawn up by the Advocate for the hearing of the Constitutional Court scheduled for June 23, will be examined when the question of constitutionality on the block of bargaining in the public sector.
The document signed by the lawyer of the State, Vincenzo Rago, in the final part focuses “on the economic impact of the contested provisions, in relation to Article 81 and 97″ of the Constitution. It is stated that “the relevant financial effects that regulatory intervention is examined are obvious. In fact, the burden resulting from the negotiation of the national level, for the period 2010-2015, relative to all staff the public, may not be less than 35 billion euro, with a structural effect of around 13 billion euro, as from 2016 “.
The Advocacy:” Subject to the prerogatives union “ – In addition, the ‘ Advocacy in the initial part of the memory as precise “in any case, the trade union prerogatives are safeguarded and are estrinsecate, among other things, the participation in the negotiations for the conclusion of supplementary agreements (CCNI), albeit within the financial limits normatively expected “and” framework contracts “. Then, he adds, he is still standing a chance “to give rise to the procedures relating to national collective agreements, albeit only for that portion legislation”. In short, highlights, this shows how “intense bargaining has been carried out, even on slopes of the new body of law, and has affected both the bargaining that the national team.”
In order to send, reply to or vote for a comment, you must be registered and log in
Registration Login X
Rules for comments
The comments on this page are checked
We encourage you to use respectful language and not offensive, even for the harshest criticism
In particular, during the monitoring activity, we reserve the right to remove comments that:
– are not relevant to the topics covered on the website and in the TV program
– they have contained vulgar, obscene or violent
– Let intimidating or defamatory towards people, other people, institutions and religions
– More generally violates the rights of third parties
– Promote illegal activities
– Promote commercial products or services
X
No comments:
Post a Comment