on the economic plan of the government for the coming years, but with the demand for greater attention to families, businesses and pensions. House and Senate approved yesterday the majority resolutions on Def, the Document of Economics and Finance. In its resolutions are listed a number of suggestions to the government but they are not binding. On flexibility in output, ie the possibility to retire earlier, they propose “selective intervention” by “reasonably anticipated penalties’, in line with what the government is studying in the decisions that will be taken in October with the law budget for 2017. Yesterday, an interview with the Messenger , Undersecretary to the Prime Minister, Tommaso Nannicini, confirmed that there is no room for generalized assumptions of flexibility in output, because it would cost between 5 to 7 billion a year, while you are thinking on the assumption of “social security loan” secured by banks and insurance companies, which would be articulated in different ways on selected audiences of workers.
The loan
The pension loan is that mechanism which would allow, to those who are a few years from retirement, to take an advance of the check (which it would be lower than full because the penalties would be triggered) as a loan to be repaid in small installments deducted from the moment begins the normal pension. According Nannicini must distinguish three categories. Those who want to retire earlier, which would have to bear in full the cost of penalties (one reasons about 3-4% per year in advance). The workers laid off by companies in crisis and in danger of ending up esodati (without pay and no pension) that “the penalty pays it to him in good part the State.” Finally, the workers pushed by the companies to go into early retirement: here should be the employers’ to cover the costs of the advance. ” In this scheme, the State will bear the costs to remunerate banks erogherebbero the board early in the form of loan and insurance companies that would ensure the risk of premature death of the pensioner. Some cost more there would be for employees of companies in crisis, but lower than that of ‘safeguards’ for esodati. The hypothesis of the social security loan is, however, rejected by the unions. “I think it’s a crazy – says the leader of the Fiom-CGIL, Maurizio Landini -. If one has paid contributions for 40-41 years that the loan should be done? He has already lent him enough money. So we do not take for c …: I do mean the dry. ” The Parliament also approved the postponement of structural balanced budget to 2019, must, says the government, to support the growth of GDP.
April 27, 2016 (modified April 27, 2016 | 23:06)
© PLAY RESERVED
No comments:
Post a Comment