Rome – A plan to ensure that those who are close to retirement to get out first. The government faces his cards after long delayed despite pressure (and proposals) parliamentarians, the INPS President Tito Boeri and trade unions. A plan that looks at three specific situations and for each imagines a multiple intervention of State, INPS, banking and insurance. More details will come in the position paper on pensions that the government is writing and ready for May: a focus on pensions and flexibility, in fact the basis for the regulatory action on the security to be included in the next Law stability, in the fall. By now you know that the plan would cost very little to the Treasury, “less than a billion,” say sources at Palazzo Chigi. Well away from the burden of other proposals, all burdened with an initial outlay of at least 5-7 billion, according to the government. Although the INPS involves a starting cost of one billion and a half (and a peak of 4.9 billion in the following years).
But what is this plan? He tells Thomas Nannicini, Secretary of Palazzo Chigi, in an interview with Messenger . “There are three categories. The first is those people who have a preference to retire earlier, for example grandmother public employee who wants to look after their grandchildren. The second is to those who need to go into early retirement, as lost his job and has not the output requirements. the third category are the workers that the company wants to retire earlier to restructure the company’s staff. Well, you could try to create a pension advances market, today there is, involving government, INPS, banks, insurance companies. “
a” market “of pension loans, then. In the first case, the grandmother would come out before (we think at most three years ahead of requirements) with a “slightly stronger penalty.” His advance would most probably financed by the banks, then reimbursed by INPS to moment tripping retirement. In the second case, the penalty for the unemployed “pays him largely the state.” In the third case, that of early retirement, “are the companies to cover part of the cost of the advance, with insurance to guarantee the death risk paid by the state,” explains Nannicini. A plan “not easy to implement,” admits the same entourage of Nannicini. And that could include a gradual approach in criminalization, to take account of low incomes, strenuous work, unemployed. “At the moment it is only a hypothesis in the study, but it could be the one that makes square the circle between the strong demand for flexibility and sustainability of public finances,” said Nannicini yet.
“A proposal that I share , the only viable if we want to give dutiful responses to the country, then, without prejudice to the reduction of taxes on work and business plan to consolidate growth, “said Enrico Zanetti, Deputy Minister of Economy and leader of Civic Choice. “The pension loan is a way to keep everyone together: those close to retirement who want to anticipate the exit and young people who have no need of terremotare the system. On the other hand, if at the first sign of recovery of the country do not consolidate, on the contrary we dissipate the savings of the reforms made, we create the conditions for an unsustainable pension system. the proposals on flexibility in output since advanced here have an initial annual cost of at least 5-7 billion. But it would be wrong load on the state budget, not because they preach a saving end in itself, but because we can not jeopardize the plan of lowering the IRES government in 2017, the personal income tax in 2018 and avoid the VAT increase, up to reabsorb forever clausle of safeguarding “.
Also satisfied Cesare Damiano, president of the pd Labour Commission of the Chamber and former minister, with some distinction: “For people like me, along with other parliamentarians, has been fighting since 2013 to have the flexibility of pensions, the very fact that there is a government proposal is a victory for common sense. Finally, the topic is the focus of discussion. a big step forward, if we consider that until recently was not a priority for the government. Then of course, in about I am not sympathetic to the idea of a loan advanced by banks and insurance companies, because the service provider has to remain INPS. If the pension Fund can do or not agreements with the world of credit, this is a theme to process all together, government and Parliament. I do not close my other hypothesis, indeed revival proposing a package on pensions which also addresses the issue of onerous ricongiunzioni, the eighth safeguard the esodati, strenuous work, the option monitoring woman. And the question in life that must be corrected, in the calculation of pensions, if there is interruption in the age of personal growth. “
No comments:
Post a Comment