Pensions, advance with graduated penalties – Il Sole 24 Ore

History of the article

Close

This article was published April 28, 2016 at 7:20.
the last change is the April 28, 2016 at 10:41 hours.

a graduated penalty depending on income for those who decide to anticipate the retirement of three years compared to requirements of the law. With a selective public financing, the biggest expense that is determined, for the eligible employees of the advance but who are in conditions of unemployment. While in other cases the bridge financing could be supported by the credit system, which then fall due to INPS mini-repayments with the deductions on the final board. Finally, early retirement put forward by restructuring businesses or who want to make a staff turnover, the advance would be financed by the employers, with a guarantee on the risk of death by the State beneficiary.

the intervention scheme they are working on the technical government coordinated by the Secretary to the prime Minister, Tommaso Nannicini, increasingly takes shape and seems to have reached a first milestone. The advance will be, precisely, with penalization “not dry” but calibrated on income, with a “cut” a little stronger for those who choose to retire before (the typical case of “Grandma civil servant” who wants to look after their grandchildren evoked by Prime time ago). It is besides the hypothesis that can be read with other words in the resolution to Def voted yesterday, where he refers to “reasonable penalties” for flexibility on the age of their retirement. The filing, a tot fixed percentage for each year ahead of the normal requirement, it should apply only on the remuneration of the post, as the contributory share provides in itself a penalty in case of withdrawal prior to full vesting of pension rights. New details on social security intervention profile, which will come out in autumn with the law of balance, came from the same Nannicini in an interview to “Messenger”. The options being considered are different and the plan is “not easy implementation ‘reiterated the undersecretary, who then postponed until the end of the legislature (2018) a strengthening intervention of the purchasing power of the poorest pensioners.

By May we will know the final scheme, the Government intends to publish a dedicated document. And yet the impact on the public finances would be almost defined: about a billion, much less, therefore, 5-7 billion, which would be used to cover in the early and most other parliamentary proposals closely, however, to 1.4 billion needed to cover the launch of the INPS scheme proposed in the document “not in cash but in fairness” of the past year and where we imagine an early exit for about 30 thousand people a year during the first application.

In the next few weeks, technicians will close the investigation also on the basis of the simulations on the potential cohorts concerned. After that will come the first public communication on the choice made. In addition to measuring-flag on flexibility would remain close to the measures on supplementary pensions, which should be used by young workers, as he had said in recent weeks more and Nannicini. In line with another indication emerged from the parliamentary debate on Def, you can then imagine a simplification action for retirements in reduced requirements for workers exposed to arduous work (on the endowment fund this year there is a dowry of over 630 million) and further refinements to margin adoptable also to the monitoring light on the latest measures taken, primarily the lengthening of the ‘option “woman” and part time increasingly easier for workers to 36 months from the requirement for retirement. The flexibility Output license plate Renzi-Nannicini should also avert the eighth safeguard for “esodati” invoked by 24 thousand former workers. But the game is just beginning to tell how it will end.

© ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Permalink