MILAN – Retiring before, but losing at least one month a year. And ‘the risk calculated by the UIL for those who want to leave the job without even having the necessary requirements. Are workers ( “the losers”, Renzi called them) who have been lengthen the years to stay in work and they are also the ones that have formed the so-called esodati, who were left with more pay and no pension . The union has therefore studied a first elaboration of the social security loan for flexibility in output that should be among the main elements of the Bee, the pension advance that the government is working. The study is based on the mechanism that will probably be adopted namely access to a pension with an advance of up to 3 years compared to the age requirement prompted by “paying” (through a loan from a lending institution, guaranteed by the state) with an installment applied on board. Assuming an index of 1% pension benefits for each year and the interest rate of 3.5%, a worker who accessed it with a year in advance and with a gross treatment of 1,000 euro would lose so 6 , 9% of the pension, or the equivalent of a monthly net amount less per year (898 EUR). The burden, of course, would grow with increasing the years ahead. For this reason the UIL expects to realize from a person who would be the interest. How have pensions in 40 years To understand what really happens, though, will have to wait a few weeks. A few days ago, in fact, the President of the Council of Ministers, Matteo Renzi, has announced that the government will intervene on the issue of pensions in the 2017 Stability Law, but will not do it by putting his hand to the entire system as it asks the president of ‘ INPS, Tito Boeri: in essence there will only be an arrangement of existing rules. The proposal that is working the Secretary of Palazzo Chigi, Thomas Nannicini will therefore solely those born in the years ’51, ’52, 53, who have been raised suddenly at 66 years the age of retirement. “Compared to the past – said Renzi on Facebook – when it was going to retire at 39 years, with 15 years, six months and one day, the retirement age today it seems too long . But compared to life expectancy. we are not working on a mechanism that will be called ‘Bee’ through which those who want can anticipate, with a cost curtailment, the retired entrance only for a certain period of time. There has worked Nannicini, has felt the INPS, the project is basically ready, the “logo is also. First, however, the government will hear the unions and the European Union.
“The high road is the reintroduction of a flexible access to retirement at 62 years. The union is ready to discuss the modalities, but we must avoid botched solutions. The pension loan has many critical . Moreover, it is unclear the type of tax that would be applied or the amount of interest, “said the confederal secretary of Uil, Domenico Proietti.
a worry is also the the fact that the government has no intention of putting hand to the entire system, leaving in limbo generation “80″, the one that runs the risk of having to stay at work until age 75, as long as you manage to find it. The hypothesis is scheduled by Fornero reform that penalizes intermittent careers, low income and weighed their access to the board with the increase in life expectancy. The law written by the former Labour government minister Monti is put on paper that those who retire with the contribution system (therefore those who started working after 1996) can go out so early (three years from the requirement) or old age only if they fulfill an income limit. And as much as this income is low, the later will be able to retire: in fact going to retire post 1996 workers must have really paid a lot of contributions.
to gain access to early retirement, in fact, the gross monthly pension can not be less than 2.8 times the social allowance, currently amounts to 448 euro. So at least 1,250 euro. To obtain, instead, the old-age allowance prediction of pension may not abut at the bottom of one and a half that check. And then, no less than 670 EUR. Who does not reach the minimum levels, eg temporary workers with contributory or self-employed who have paid little holes, will have to stay at work four years longer than the finish of old age, even seven more of the amount advanced. Translated in terms of current requirements: instead to 63 years and 7 months to 66 years and 7 months, you go to 70 years and 7 months. The “boys” of 1980 could have been worse, because if when they retire and life expectancy is still stretch, could risk going out in 76 and 4 months.
- Topics:
- pension
- bee
- pension loan
- uIL
- Starring:
- Matteo Renzi
No comments:
Post a Comment