According to the Camusso, secretary of the CGIL, the pension reform 2016/2017 , called APE, is yet another ‘pet’ that he uses the rhetoric of the government Renzi: at the time that there would be no principled declarations and slogans, while you are waiting on what are considered the fundamental characteristics of the instrument to the study and that the penalties. On the topic intervened Minister Giuliano Poletti , which would ensure that there will be a differentiation in penalties as the extent of the check and income. Meanwhile, it is reported that it is leaving the first pension reform measure enacted by the executive: it is the Loan Facilitated Retirement and the words of Giuliano Poletti about are very cautious; is a test, says the minister, and you have to figure out what will appeal to workers and companies. News also from Tito Boeri that appears to support the Renzi government work regarding the EPA and the new pressure of precocious workers who insist, on the Facebook page of the Democratic Party, so will not disappear entirely the hypothesis of a Unit 41.
differentiated Penalties? Poletti and the latest reform pensions now May 11
The statements that are destined to make to discuss the most are those of Giuliano Poletti, who, referring to the 2016/2017 pension reform defined ‘APE’, it said that the node of the penalties is the most complex and that the Renzi government is thinking of a separate platform. Reflection of the Minister is as follows: Not all workers close to retirement may get penalty of 3%, because they should be differentiated from income; Simply put, those who earn 3 thousand euro must necessarily suffer higher penalties. The crux, however, was not dissolved in the last days, in fact, has been published a study of the UIL , which, starting from some predictions on interest rates, has shown that, with the penalties the government study, a worker earning € 1,000 a month would lose approximately one month if it withdraws a year earlier, but more than two if it withdraws with three years in advance. In short, his words seemed just centered: the problem is not who earns 3 thousand euro, but who earns 1000 Euros and likely unsustainable penalty.
Tito Boeri and the early pressure: latest news today pension reform May 11
also, is noted on the front of the 2016/2017 reform pensions , an intervention of Tito Boeri seems to take the government’s defenses and support the effort that is being done to think of a flexible tool for the early withdrawal: the President of INPS recalled also that for each worker who stays in his job for five more years, a young worker is not hired. The problem, then, would be that of cohesion between generations : in short, should the retirees to give up a percentage of the board to facilitate the entry of young people. Meanwhile, we report a new pressing by precocious workers , who feel completely betrayed by the EPA at the time, too, despite the 41 years and often more contribution, should be subject to penalties if they want to get out early. The pressure is continuing mainly on Social Media , with a message sent to the bulletin board of the Democratic Party. For updates on pensions, EPA and penalties, Click ‘Follow’ high above the article.
No comments:
Post a Comment