Tuesday, June 14, at the meeting organized between unions and government on social security, there will be no way to deal with all the problems of the subject. The flexibility output is undoubtedly the first point of discussion, starting from the proposed EPA Government. But there are other issues to be addressed and which will undoubtedly be discussed. The last words of Damiano are quite decided on what you need to do to fix our pension system and to correct the errors and fix the disasters caused by the last of the pension reform Fornero.
Coming l ‘ latest protection?
the President of the Commission Work of the House, as is now already well known, although pleased with the fact that the Government beginning to talk about pension reform, it is not completely d ‘agreement with the pension or Bee advance, as proposed by the Government. Firstly, because it challenges the structure, from the years of advance granted to the pension loan through banks, but also because there are people who should be treated in another way, to which not just the ‘ APE . Among the employees referred Damian asks interventions in their own right, not necessarily included in a global container as it could be flexibility in output, are definitely esodati. There are still between 25,000 and 30,000 workers that the Fornero has left no pension and no job, the famous esodati. They are all those workers who did not return in the seven previous safeguards. But now this seems to be a common line and the eighth and final safeguard should soon be prepared through a separate decree, like the previous ones. This is confirmed by the statistical data made public by INPS confirming that substantial resources are still available in the Fund for safeguards because they were covered fewer workers than was estimated previously. Damiano is therefore preparing the draft Law for the eighth and final safeguard, without weighing on public finances but using what is left of the 11 billion allocated for more than 170 thousand workers, including as we said, they are out anchors a lot ‘.
who are the subjects to be protected and what yet another prepares
the eighth safeguard workers concerned are those who have failed to return earlier, even those who have not done in time to join the seventh, namely that they have not produced the instance. Then there are those who despite having the requirements at 31 December 2012 for the board with the old pre-Fornero rules were not consistently work because unemployed at 28 December 2011. There are then those workers who had reached retirement with old standards, within 36 months of the end of their mobility. Finally, those who should fall to 2012 were to assist disabled relatives with Law 104 , those who had been kept out of the fact that the family member to attend was bound to be a child. Resolved safeguarding without impacting on public finances and without putting it in the cauldron of social security reform, we must resolve the issue of flexibility. Damian as we said not keen to see a system where it is not the ‘ INPS to pay pensions. In addition to this, the flexibility with checks more strongly penalized than foresaw his proposal and granted starting from 63 years instead of 62, require further investigation. Without taking into account the fact that early must be treated separately, allowing the portion 41, Option woman also should be extended to other workers and ricongiunzioni should be free and not more onerous because it amounts to charge twice the contribution to workers.
No comments:
Post a Comment