->
ALL BACK: The IMF vote “Yes” in the referendum. So much for democracy
The attempt to construct a cordon sanitaire attorbno Renzi and his periclitante Company to remain at Palazzo Chigi after the constitutional referendum continues busy on the international front. After the media campaign, which began on the columns of the Financial Times, Wall Street Journal and The Economist came the turn of the “heavyweights.” Presenting at midnight of ‘yesterday data on’ Italian economy – with devastating prophecy of a twenty-year recession – the International Monetary Fund has cast his vote in the constitutional referendum in the fall: it will be a ‘Yes’ in the respect of the sovereignty of the Italian in that “it is up to decide on the referendum on the reform.”
So says Rishi Goyal, head of the mission of Italy ‘organization during a conference call on the publication of’ annual analysis on ‘Italian economy If, by chance, Italians vote against this masterpiece of “efficiency”, the ‘warning is clear.
L’ outcome of the referendum, writes the Manifesto, “is certainly a factor in investment decisions that conditions l ‘outlook.” In other words, and in practice, if he wins the “No,” the ‘IMF can make a catastrophic report on’ economy and direct investments elsewhere. And the ‘markets’ could trigger speculative attacks. The thought alone can bring into fibrillation ‘s entire institutional system, ready to explore new approaches for political chin Commissioner of the Italian’ disobedient ‘. The theorem is ready, the referendum campaign will affect the next few weeks. Any consideration on the respect of the democratic will seem superfluous.
L ‘IMF cites a City group report that is the basis of both the Financial Times articles that the dire prediction of’ Economist according to which the Italian is the next European crisis after Brexit. The constitutional referendum – and not the toxic loans in the bellies of Italian banks – is “the biggest risk on the European political landscape of 2016, since the political future of Renzi might be.
->
No comments:
Post a Comment