: The decree was not written in consultation with the Ministry of Economy but, by Via XX Settembre, was expressed a simple authorization to iter proseguio trial.
“It’s something fundamentally different” because, explains the organ of administrative legal advice, with the concert “the minister participates policy initiative, competing for responsible,” says the Council of State. Then we move on to substantive comments, starting with the “lack of definition of television set ‘, for the imposition of the fee. In particular, the CDS notes that “in the text of the regulation lacks any reference to a definition of what is meant by a television set, whose detention involves the payment of the relevant subscription fee and the fact that the fee is payable for a single device , regardless of the actual number of units owned by the individual user. “
The State Council recalls that this is particularly important, given that” the technological development of communication devices has made available on multiple market ‘devices that allow you to receive functions of television programs that they use for their purpose and which are structurally different uses “, such as tablets and smartphones. It then moves on to the profiles of respect and protection of privacy, related to the exchange of information between different bodies, under the Regulation. “In those rules -osserva the CDs- do not find any reference to the issue.”
The State Council also reveals that the regulation “have not been provided with adequate forms of advertising, compared to the high level diffusion reached by television. ” The organ then asks the administration to give “the widest possible dissemination, in the forms deemed most appropriate, the provisions of the fee collection”, with particular reference to those proceedings involving a user load requirements.
No comments:
Post a Comment