->
The hopes of the government , obviously, were misplaced. After a day in which Prime Minister’s office had leaked the confirmation that the government intended “not repay” all the Retired damaged by the blockade of the adjustment to inflation rejected by Constitutional Court , in order to reduce the shock on the public accounts, in the same evening View blocked the road to that hypothesis. Clarifying that the restitution of stolen goods is a must , because judgment announced last Thursday that is itself erga omnes and immediately application . In short, does not serve any use . Cold shower, then, for the premier Matteo Renzi and the minister Pier Carlo Padoan , who now have to cope with a hole estimated to be at least 9 billion euro.
According to what had transpired in the afternoon, the initial intention was to restore what was lost due to the standard Fornero only to those who receive checks up to seven times the minimum, and to an extent Low with increasing treatment. Counting on the fact that pensioners more “rich” have renounced recourse to recover “from 1000 to 1500 euro”, because to deal with the legal battle if it should have to bear all cost . To anticipate the “plan” was the Economy Undersecretary Enrico Zanetti , stating that “it is unthinkable ” you give back the money to the Retired “taking 3,500-4,000 Euros per month, when he asked the youth to go to the system contributions and almost retired move forward the age to retire . Would immoral , an injustice frightening, and the government has to say that again. “
Too bad the same premise of the way forward identified by the government has been demolished in the evening, when” sources close to the Court “have made it known through news agencies that all judgments of the consultation, unless stated in the order issued by the courts (which, in this case, there are not) buy effective days after publication in the Official Journal. To obtain a refund of amounts not received in terms of indexing, then, just do application to the INPS and not need an action, because after the judgment The refund is an obligation by the state. The fact remains that, as happened in cases, in similar cases, the same lawyers can advise the remedy of an action as a way to build a stronger action and to request reimbursement.
At this point, therefore, The government must find the resources to cope with an outlay that could come close to one percentage point of GDP. Although, in the absence of official data, continue to be widely conflicting estimates: the labor consultants have quantified the impact of 6 billion, but the study center Nens , in which appends the CGIA Mestre, it goes to figure in more than 16 billion euro. This, of course, if the pronouncement of the consultation would be respected in full, re-evaluating all treatments exceeding € 1,443.
Meanwhile, the European Commission Also Wednesday came the warning that Brussels “waiting for the government’s decision on how to implement the ruling of the consultation and assess its impact on the accounts”, but “this must not undermine the commitment to comply with Italian Pact rules “, starting from the commitment to contain the deficit within 3% of gross domestic product. There is a real deadline within which Palazzo Chigi must present the EU executive their own decisions, but there is a significant circumstance that could accelerate moves Italian: May 13 will discuss the Country Specific Recommendations , the annual document in which the Commission gives to the States “report cards” and “homework”, ie an overall assessment of the state of public finances in relation to the budgetary targets and a review of the reforms under way and their impact. If Italy does not send any information before that date, the rate on its accounts is likely to be a pending judgment in that then the data on deficit and debt should be modified. ->
No comments:
Post a Comment