Matteo Renzi returns to Rome in the morning and before moving on to the future secretariat of the dem and of the electoral law and sends to the members of the Pd a message : “Give the go-ahead to the commission of inquiry on banks”. And so, a few hours from the opening of the debate to Parliament, urged by the opposition, the leader of the Pd is forcing his party to rewrite the motion which shortly will be presented in the Classroom and in which appears the demand for the establishment of a commission of inquiry, analagomante to what has already been asked by Fi, and other opposition groups. An input from the Nazarene is also shot in the Senate where he has just begun his procedure, the decree on savings and where , in the afternoon of yesterday, was due to discuss the request of the M5s to support the “declaration of urgency” to the bill establishing a commission of inquiry on Mps, introduced by senators pentastellati but also by other parliamentary groups, including the Pd, over a year ago and that since then, is the examination of the Finance committee where a hearing on the banks that will end soon . In the end the comparison in the Senate was delayed because of the agenda of the work of the Classroom, but it is likely that the request of 5stars will not be accepted as the majority would like to work on untesto unified 13 ddl submitted, which include the establishment of a bicameral to fathom the problems of the entire banking sector and not only of Mps, as foreseen by the proposal of the M5s. The intention of the majority, has explained the chairman of the Finance committee, Mauro Maria Marino, is precisely that of working on a single text, which analyzes the functioning of t he credit system, focusing as they ask for the motions voted on yesterday in Parliament, on the most critical cases to ensure the responsible of the crack that have brought so far to rescue the first of the old Banca Etruria, Banca Marche, to Carife and Carichieti and today to enter the State in the share capital of Mps. But the inquiry can look like in the requests of the senators, as well as other cases, such as the two in the veneto region.
it Is evident that the choice of the Pd to the side in favor of the commission of inquiry has an important value, first of all, politics, which is to avoid that the dems were considered the party that does not want to allow Parliament to investigate the crack bank. So it was that at the end of the confrontation in the Chamber has produced a series of approvals bipartisan of the various motions (Pd-Ncd, Fi, Alloy, Wing, and Civic innovators, the Italian Left). With the motion, however, asks that the parliamentary inquiry should also look “to the analysis of the delinquencies that have contributed to the crisis”.In particular, the motion of the Pd stresses that one of the duties of the commission shall be “the identification of any responsibility of the directors”, the security rating on the “proper and effective exercise of the functions of supervision and control” and “analysis of delinquencies that have contributed to such crisis”. In this last point there is the reference to the “lodo Patuelli, i.e. the request to publish the names of the principal insolvent debtors of the banks that are helped by the State as a Mps, or end up in resolution as happened in Banca Marche, Banca Etruria, Cariferrara and Carichieti. A reminder, as you can see, pretty open ended, on a theme that appears destined to return soon in the Senate, in the yard of the amendments to the decree banks. Ache because the oppositions are willing to ride the “praise Patuelli” (FdI, the party Giorgia Meloni, has already filed a proposed law ad hoc).
© Reproduction reserved
No comments:
Post a Comment