Sunday, December 28, 2014

Jobs Act: controversy over dismissal state. Renzi: ‘He will decide the … – ANSA.it

Jobs Act: controversy over dismissal state. Renzi: 'He will decide the … – ANSA.it

Will the Parliament to decide on whether or not the state licenziabilità . There is case law in either direction. But will not the government to decide. In February, when the measure on public employment signed by Marianna Madia will be discussed in Parliament, will be the Rooms to choose from. Do not miss the debate, of course. “The Prime Minister says Matteo Renzi in an interview with Qn in which defends the scope of the Jobs Act and its laws regarding work.

But there remains the controversy in the state government on the implementation of the Jobs Act. Senator Choice of civic Pietro Ichino writes that the contract at increasing protections also apply to state, as the new law does not excludes explicitly. The Minister of Welfare Giuliano Poletti and that the PA Marianna Madia but belie the hypothesis. But the Economy Undersecretary Enrico Zanetti Choice of civic, blurts out: “I find this quite frankly baffling antics of some ministers in denying the applicability of the Jobs Act to public employment. Dualism with individuals not stand ‘. “The JobsAct applies to civil servants, will be licensable. Indeed not. Indeed, perhaps. In fact we will see. From lay in the trunk is #Renzi!”. Writes on twitter the federal secretary of the League, Matteo Salvini.

Even Beppe Grillo delivers a heavy attack. “In a few days beginning balances, and this year the Government proposes the sale of the right to work. You have been dismissed without just cause? Do not worry, you’ll be given a small compensation, and so we can pretend nothing. No real protection, but only an inexpensive dining, true moral blackmail that leverages the fragility of those who today can not afford to miss work. ” And ‘what underlines a blog post by Beppe Grillo entitled “Jobs Act The growing disappointments.” “From today we are born without the right to work, you buy every day and sometimes you lose it along the way. They call them” protections growing “, we know that it is violation of rights. Great news for new hires that bringing over the total staff of 15 employees: new employees will apply the regime to “expect growing”, and will suffer the same fate veterans (old recruits) who still believed in protections acquired, “it said in the post, signed by the Parliamentary Assembly of the M5S Laura Castelli and accompanied by a photo of the ad Fca Sergio Marchionne making the gesture of the umbrella to the “Workers”. “Reforms should be born to give more opportunities for people to grow and improve their lives, yet the reality is that this reform creates greater social instability, insecurity of life and inability to build the future. With this reform will not sustain the family, you do not pay the rent, does not contract a mortgage to purchase a home, then you do not allow a dignified life, “said the post.

Always Grillo says” matches Iva horned and mazziate “. “Tough Life for VAT registration. The reform of Labour worst in history, signed by the government in power, destroys them. The people of professionals will face a real drain from 2015. A whopping signed Renzi which means Fisco and INPS. The system of minimum, a status facilitated intended for under 35, in practice no longer exists. Or rather, it exists, but it is a rip off. ” And ‘what is said in a blog post by Beppe Grillo called “games Ive horned and mazziate” and signed by “a VAT.” “From January 1, the rate tripled: switch to 15%. But it is only the beginning, because 30 000 euro, it seems, are too many. The government has introduced different thresholds depending on the activity. To pay the 15%, traders have to cash in less than 40 thousand euro. Young professionals less than 15 thousand, “said the post, which then attacks:” But it is not over. The government has given the green light to increases contributions INPS for members the separate management. A measure, provided by the Reformation Fornero and blocked by previous governments, that it will bring the rate of 27-33% by 2018. In short, horned and clubs. “

To Civati , from the minority Democratic Party around incomprehensible words – “Now, I say this without controversy: this round of statements to me is incomprehensible. If it was so worried, you could collect the signatures of hundreds of parliamentarians to prevent the Jobs Act contained the dismissal rules and easy on the demotion before reaching the discussion to the Chamber, as I had proposed. And, instead, it is preferred to treat, then to mediate, then position yourself, then share with concern, then worry about sharing. The problem is not one of the current Democratic Party, is the reality of things. “And ‘what he writes on his blog the deputy Pd Pippo Civati ​​intervening in the debate on the Jobs Act.” I read interesting articles in which the so-called minority of Pd (I say so-called because it is not clear who is in the minority, since all currents are in government and in national secretariat, apart writer an d a few others) is alternating judgments that change by the hour on the Jobs Act: first the parent teased Sacconi (which actually I think is very satisfied), is now demanding changes to the government decree. Who voted for talk of “constitutional injury.” Who produced the mediation talks of excessive delegation, explains Civati, then joked: “It seems to be born a new trend: that of” trattativisti “, hoping to change the text of Poletti, after having welcomed the news that came from Palazzo Chigi only a few hours ago. Poletti them already ‘reassured’: do not change a comma. That’s okay. “

Renzi: ‘I do not fear threats, least of all by the CGIL ‘- The Jobs Act, says Renzi in Qn, “is also the tax cuts starting from IRAP and 80 euro, is the solution to the many corporate crises, is the fight against bureaucracy and for a more efficient civil justice” . The CGIL says “ready for anything” to block reform … “I have the utmost respect for the union, and I say this without controversy either hypocrisy or irony – ensures Renzi – but I’m not the type who is unimpressed by threats. Least of the CGIL. That showed, on strike, and opposed in every way our reforms. If you have other ways to say no, I will explain in front of the country, there is the usual place, at Palazzo Chigi to try to change the ‘Italy’. The prime minister then explains that to see the first results will be brief: “the first effects will be seen as early as 2015, I am convinced, provided, however, not to give up and continue on the path of reform”

Poletti: Jobs Act does not change, the law only for individuals – The Jobs Act “the fundamental points are defined.” Reiterates the Labour Minister Giuliano Poletti, interviewed by Republic, excluding changes to the measure and closing the demands of Ncd and left of the Democratic Party: “Negotiations really. The Committees will give an opinion and the government will consider. I would say that the substance of the decree is and will remain one, the fact remains that we will examine very carefully the comments that were received and decide collectively. ” Minister rules out that the new rules will also apply to state: “I would say no. When we passed the enabling law we always have exclusive reference to work in the private sector.” He then explains why they extended the new rules to collective redundancies: “To a need for consistency of the regulatory framework. Since the collective redundancies are always motivated by economic reasons or organization would be inconsistent to exclude the reinstatement for those individual and not to collective ones. ” Excludes any second thoughts, as calls instead the minority Democratic Party views the disparity between new and old assumptions: “Respect all positions, but a reform should be evaluated in its overall balance. And this reform is balanced.” Also no criticism of the CGIL: “It seems a radical change from the past and it is wrong not to want to see.” Poletti also stressed the advantages for companies and workers: “Businesses have a framework of greater certainty about what happens in the event of dismissal. For many young people there is the advantage of having a contract protections growing indefinitely, with the right to holidays, sickness, maternity that otherwise would never have had with precarious contracts. “

Madia: ‘Yes to change indication of Parliamentary’ -” According to us, and according to the technicians of the government, the law, the whole set on private work, is written so that it is not disputed that the new rules do not apply to civil servants. ” Interviewed by the Press Minister P. A. Marianna Madia excludes so the scope of new rules to the state. “Then – he adds – though technically we were to determine that it is better to specify, we could also do it. But I’d do a debate by codicil: the point is that the political will of the government is to not include in the new rules public workers.” Madia also denies the cancellation of a rule excluding civil servants, as the senator of Sc Pietro Ichino, “What was the paragraph he says so. We are not a government that sudden: if we want to address this issue, we do it in a thorough discussion in Parliament in the reform of the Pa, do not try to impose it with the cunning of a paragraph of the night in a private proxy at work. ” Then open to possible changes to the decrees in the transition from the parliamentary committees: “Why not? The issues are more detailed, the better.” And about any changes on collective redundancies warns: “The synthesis in which they arrived Renzi and Minister Poletti seems done with balance, not to create inequality. We will see the views, if they are not excluded convincing changes.” Finally a hint to the employees of the provinces: “The precarious contracts are extended for one year” after “we’ll see. What I can already assure you that none of the assumptions of the provinces will lose the place.”

Damiano, Renzi adopt the German model, but all – “I, like Sacconi, I suggest to Renzi to adopt the German model: all, however, not only in the parts that are convenient. In that model the protections start from 10 employees, the dismissal must be previously submitted to the assessment of union representation, the reinstatement also applies to economic dismissals and the court may decide whether to reinstate or compensate the worker. ” So says the President of the Labour Commission of the Chamber Cesare Damiano. “The models can not be cut into slices like salami, how would claim to do the Ncd: it would be too easy. Also, if you like Filippo Taddei says what counts is the intention of the legislature – continues the President – we note that since beginning the Government has only ever spoken of article 18 and dismissal and not of law 223 and collective redundancies. We will ask then to clear the scope of new rules to co llective redundancies, using the rules of the national labor contracts to “typify” disciplinary dismissals and raise 4 to 6 months socket base for the compensation of employees “. “We will evaluate – concludes Damiano – all aspects of the Decrees which could lead to possible cases of” excessive delegation. “

Sacconi, explaining why the government does not apply to Pa -” I remember still – says the leader of the Senate popular area, Maurizio Sacconi, about the Jobs Act – which in Parliament Ncd introduced an amendment to the approval of labor, public and private, with the sole exception of the so-called careers Order (prefectures , diplomacy, military and police, magistrates) and the insolvency of input. The PI may well use the apprenticeship, should respect the rules on contracts ending the long period of insecurity which then stabilizes without competition, would be subject to dismissal procedures individually and collectively. Withdrew the amendment – continues – because the Government was committed to implementing the existing rule, which commits him to unification. Now please explain why not. And no recourse to formal reasons because they would be in favor of our thesis. Tell us in substance what reasons of efficiency milit ate against the only labor market. Popular Area will insist with the strength of good arguments that want government increasingly coming to the criteria of good employer and the efficiency with verifiable economic accounting for cost centers “.

LikeTweet

No comments:

Post a Comment