"we would like to note that the right of criticism and social mobilization apply now for a piece of 'companions', only for the cartoon characters and not for people of flesh and bones." The Cgil makes it so tit for tat to Sergio Staino. The director of the'Unit, in an editorial published Saturday on the daily Pd, had set fire to the powders, accusing the Confederation of having chosen, under the guidance of Susanna Camusso, a road too far from the one sketched out by the historical lea der as a Luciano Lama and Bruno Trentin taught by the father of Bobo "as both deleterious and harmful to the fate of democracy, the fact that the union can get to the tail of the demagogic popular events". So much to say to Staino that "I always think of these two bright characters whenever I stumble in one of your own (of Camusso, ed) event extemporaneous and I think with a lot of pain that you now do not have almost nothing to share with them."
The point, in particular, to the director of the newspaper founded by Gramsci, is that the Camusso has not made her the main objective of the trade unionists of the calibre of the Blade and Trentin: to educate and grow the workers , "give them the capacity to be actors principles of the construction of democracy, by eliminating all those forms of rebelliousness sterile and an end in itself-that the historical lesson of marxist dismissing with the adjective 'sottoproletario'. That is the only way the union could play the role of the interlocutor of Parliament, and of the Government, alternating the box to fight for their rights". A dialog that the current Cgil according to Staino does not try at all. "Unfortunately, in your action and in your thought, Susan, I am not meeting this goal so high, and so the duty of a trade union that has the desire to improve the condition of the world of work in a democracy, advanced what is our – has sun k the cartoonist – Now your action is only a continuous, repetitive, attack on the government of round, without offering at the same time, a project, a perspective and a consequent political action. A union can not remain on the barricades indefinitely waiting for a change in the government. It is an expectation sterile. You have to learn to confront yourself with the policy, to talk, to bargain, taking the union away from the individual strategies of the parties".
Otherwise? "With this attitude and under your direction, the Cgil, is running the risk terrible, become a roaring crowd undifferentiated, without any connotation of class, especially a class responsible towards the society and its democratic institutions". Examples? Before the participation in the referendum campaign on the front line of the no, and then, predictably, the consultation of the people on the Jobs Act where the questions will be reviewed by the Constitutional Court between a handful of days and have taken the place of the constitutional referendum in the role of the battle-field of the Democratic Party. As shows the same position of Staino. According to which the embarrassing case of the Spi-Cgil emilia fished to use the deprecated voucher to pay for the collaboration, should demonstrate to Camusso, the exaggeration of the position of the federal government. "Do esn’t it seem like you have lost the sense of reality of things, their concreteness? All the things that I seem to have lost those companions of the Spi-Cgil," reads the introduction to the lesson of life: "then go back on the great binary of our labour history, our experience, our struggles for unity and progress".
Toni and unacceptable ways according to the Cgil, who replied on Sunday morning with a note signed by all the national secretary and by the secretaries of the category, to underline the fact that to dictate the line of the swiss Confederation is not a single woman in command (and in disarray), but rather a "board" that shares goals and strategies. Strategy that, he claims, the Cgil, has not at all neglected, dialogue and mediation, as evidenced by the framework agreement for the renewal of public contracts, the verbal summary on the subject of social security and the agreement on representation and representativeness. In practice, still lays claim to being the federal government, the unique and fundamental confrontation with the government, for another fifteen years, are "policies in the workplace, the absence of a employment strategy, the persistent action
against the rights individual and collective". Perhaps, therefore, u rges the Cgil "you should ask yourself if the obvious failure of the policies of rigor and austerity, the defeat of the theory that precarizzando the work and reducing the rights would have created more jobs, and would not require a majority to the Government, which calls itself reformist, a decided to exchange the to".
